Here's my take on this...
Honest guys are always going to be honest guys and crooks will always be crooks. Nothing, NOTHING will change this. Period.
So, we can have rules, we can have regulations, we can have bylaws, definitions and standards out the wazooo... and the honest guys will still be honest and the crooks will still be crooks.
You can go to Canal Street and buy one helluva' convincing fake Rolex for $29. Don't you think Rloex has invested a couple of bucks trying to prevent that? Don't you think the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry has tried to stop that? We are not talking old fishing reels here... this is serious stuff! It can't be stopped.
I commend all of you guys for your conviction and your enthusiasm but just don't see our cause getting outside of our tiny little circle.
Dean.
Repairs, restoration, etc.
- Paul M
- Ultra Board Poster
- Posts: 2205
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Recommended Practice
I think there would be no harm done if ORCA members got their heads together and published a Recommended Practice that said: If you are going to create a replacement part for a (collectible) reel, then it should be marked by the part maker in the following (unobtrusive) manner...
ORCA can form a committee to specify guidelines for symbols like hallmarks used for silver or whatever.
ORCA could act as a registrar/repository for the maker's marks. It would take a bit of record keeping (perhaps by the library) and some committee work to develop the guidelines and approve/register new marks.
The documentation can be extremely brief, posted in electronic format right on this website, avoiding costs for hard copy printing.
This approach provides a mechanism for preventative restoration that automatically includes an audit trail of who did what. People will feel better about any reels in their possession that comply with a recommended practice endorsed by ORCA.
ORCA can form a committee to specify guidelines for symbols like hallmarks used for silver or whatever.
ORCA could act as a registrar/repository for the maker's marks. It would take a bit of record keeping (perhaps by the library) and some committee work to develop the guidelines and approve/register new marks.
The documentation can be extremely brief, posted in electronic format right on this website, avoiding costs for hard copy printing.
This approach provides a mechanism for preventative restoration that automatically includes an audit trail of who did what. People will feel better about any reels in their possession that comply with a recommended practice endorsed by ORCA.
all of my worked is marked!






