Decided to consolidate some things here, since... I'm on to something!
It's mid-summer and I'm finally clearing some time to see what I can find in the larger of the two ponds we co-own.
Been having a tough time finding quality bass in this pond. From this spring's fishing -a peak time to find out what a water body can produce- I know the pond holds promise. It can grow some large bass. But, there appears to be a hole in the year classes, with precious few mid-sized, "quality" bass; The ones that keep us casting and able to tell us when we're... on to something.
There are many small skinny bass here. An upcoming year class? Or stunted? Likely both. I've found some 10" individuals that are sexually mature: stunted individuals. Most males I've seen on beds have been 9 or 10" long, too small to fend off the hordes of sunfish. The little males I've observed (by video) last just a couple of days before they are overwhelmed and abandon their beds.
The ponds are unmanaged, beyond the addition of grass carp years ago. Grass carp have some disadvantages in that they can really clear out the vegetation in a pond, but then leave the unpalatable plants behind, namely coontail. Coontail then takes over and grows so dense that the initial point of weed management is lost. Coontail is also shade tolerant, so those bassy looking coontail mats and lily pad flats are NOT hollow underneath. Actual mats and breaks in that cover are relatively rare, making sunfish hunting for the bass a challenge -hence the skinny small bass that just can't break out of insectivory. The lack of breaks in the cover also makes the fishing challenging. Where I can put a lure, and have it be effective, is limited.
A veritable wall-to-wall coontail carpet:
I started my mid-summer fishing plying the main basin where there is open water and outer weed edges. But, cranking and worming (Jig, Wacky, Neko) has not yielded a single quality bass. Next up is the lily pad fields that rim the pond. And it was obvious at the get-go that there are a LOT of bluegills in those pads. Their surface feeding can sound like popcorn popping in there. And the occasional crash or surge tells me they are not alone in all that dense cover. No surprise really: Cover and food. Some of those surges are almost scary sounding, so it appears that there are likely, at least some, large bass in those pads.
Bluegill beneath the pads.
So, it was time to break out the heavy gear and get into the thick stuff. Time to go a-“froggin’” -one of the few lures that can actually fish through that stuff, and cover water too. I say "froggin'" because the prey the bass would be targeting is not frogs but bluegills. Frogs are mostly shoreline bound. It's surface feeding bluegills the bass are after. One might think that a lure on top of the pads wouldn't suggest "bluegill" but I have got to see bluegills get themselves up onto the pads and have to skitter across them to get back into the drink. Most bluegill activity is happening beneath the pads of course, which has me wondering whether all the misses commonly associated with “froggin’” are the result of confusion in the bass’s part -the bass expecting the prey to be just beneath the surface, not above. And the act of getting a bluegill into your mouth is likely different than for a buoyant floating lure. Just guesses. They do miss, and expend some real energy in their attempts. It amazes me how much water they can throw when they crash a "frog" lure!
Again, there does not appear to be a large population of mid-sized bass to tip me off to a pattern. Little fish don't count. And big fish, well, they are always on the rare side. This is needle-in-a-haystack fishing, the haystack part being quite literal in this case. My job is to home in on the areas that are attracting the better bass. I’ve done this primarily by watching and, especially, listening while I fish. I have developed an ear for those surges and crashes, and drop waypoints in my mind on those areas. One area in particular stood out, collecting "virtual waypoints “, where one of the tiny creek inlets enters. This is not the main creek channel that runs the length of this dammed pond. It’s a tiny side tributary, but runoff has created quite a silt bottomed delta or flat, that has been colonized by water lilies over time. During run-off periods the tiny creek has managed to cut a weed free channel out into that flat. The collection of "virtual waypoints" in this general area has finally allowed me to say, “I’ve found ‘em!”
But what a bear to fish! The pads are so densely grown that they overlap each other over large expanses. A hollow-body “frog” doesn't even touch water through much of it. One might think that the pads would block enough light that the water beneath would be relatively weed free, open for hunting bass. But no. Coontail is shade tolerant and remains fairly dense from top to bottom. There is very little surface matting with open water beneath.
Some bass may have figured out how to catch bluegills in the dense stuff. But, so far, I’ve found I have to rely on bass being along the edges where the pads form a single layer. So, I'm searching for those needles at the edges of the haystack! At least there are some big ones out there for all the trouble.
The first catch in the inlet spot was a 15”er that struck a frog, three times before I was able to stick him. One! That’s a start. "I may indeed be on to something." This fish is on the thin side, not uncommon in mid-summer when water temps are high. However, this pond has remained in the upper 70's for much of the summer. The thin body may have more to do with the difficulty catching appropriate sized prey fishes in the dense vegetation.
A day later, I lost a big one that simply buried me. Big wake and then loud violent surge of a strike; The scary kind! I'd been casting from shore, right at the mouth of the tiny creek inlet, and realized what a mistake it was to be shore-bound as I couldn't paddle over and dig her out. Had to back the drag all the way off, drop the rod in the grass, and hike around to my kayak, paddle out, and rescue my rig. All that was there at the hook end was a big wad of lilies impaled by my frog’s double hooks.
The next day brought a barrel of a 19"er that missed then struck on a follow up cast. It's been my experience that fish rarely come again to follow up casts. Not so when "frogging". Seems they are still looking for that pesky bluegill after a miss. She was a different individual from the 19er I’d caught this spring, by body markings. Good to know there are more than one! This 19er was almost a welcome consolation for the one lost the previous evening. I say almost because the lost fish haunts me still. It was big.
This pond is turning out to be something of a "trophy fishery", a whole lotta work for few -but big- bites: One to three a day. Missing or losing fish is rough. And gosh those big fish are strong! Fighting big bass in dense pads from a lightweight whisp of a kayak is a recipe for... chaos. They turn down and wrap up in those lily “cables”, pulling the kayak to them. Then it’s hand-lining to get a thumb-lock on them. It's a physical fight at boatside; Water and weeds flying. I'll get smarter about it as I go. And I'm sure I'll lose a few more. Happy with each victory.
Oh yes, the reel used: I'm not using one of my lovely old direct drive reels. Even my solid old Pflueger Supremes. What a scary thought adding a DD reel to the chaos! My "frogging" has been done with a "modern" reel, a 1982 ABU Ultra Mag II (the year ABU introduced magnetic cast control to the US market). I’ve added carbon drag washers and a complete internal polishing and lubing. She functions beautifully, essentially fire and forget. Nothing wanting. Fifty pound braid with a ~8ft 20lb nylon mono leader is being used. The mono slips through the pads better, offering less friction than the braid. The leader needs to be replaced periodically due to UV sunlight and physical abuse. When big fish are present our tackle is at risk. Better safe than sorry.