
It raises many questions in my mind. How could Penn compete with a company like Pflueger? Pflueger had many years in the reel manufacturing business, it had to be a much wealthier company, that could afford more expensive lawyers than Penn. The patent Pflueger accuses Penn of infringinging on pre-dates Penn's patents yet we now know that the reel in question (Model K w/ star drag) became the Penn Long Beach and had a very long successful production run.
Lets have a look at the patent that Pflueger claims Penn stole...


When I see the Pflueger Patent, the date tells me that Pflueger patented these designs in April, 1932, while the earliest Penn patent I have ever seen dates to July, 1932. Looking at page two, figure 8 of the Pflueger patent shows me a drag assembly that looks exactly like a Penn Model K or Long Beach drag assembly. It looks to me that Pflueger is right in their accusations.
Now Penn did not ignore Pflueger, they responded directly to the letter of accusation from Pflueger with another letter. Check it out:

Penn asked for a meeting with a Pflueger executive. I wonder what happened at that meeting. Obviously the manufacture of the Longbeach was not ended, as Pflueger wanted. I suspect a deal was made. Even though Pflueger is claiming a infringement on the drag assembly, I believe the Penn Seaford was a larger infringement of Pflueger design than the drag assembly claim that Pflueger states in their letter. I feel that way because if you look at the Seaford that was made in 1933 it has a pivoting bridge to disengage the spool for free spool operation just like a Pflueger reel. Compare all Seaford's made after 1934 and you will see a complete design change of that model.
So what do you all feel about this?. Did Penn steal ideas and make deals with Pflueger to avoid the courts ? If you make comparisons with other manufactures of the era there are many similarities in each others products. Ocean City had take apart Salt Water Conventional reels years before Penn's Silver Beach reels, was there another patent infringement with that feature?
I wonder what kind of can of worms we can open up if we start looking for who stole what idea from who
