NOS Penn 712Z Spinfisher
NOS Penn 712Z Spinfisher
New old stock Penn 712Z spinning reel. Black & gold anodized, in bubble package, approximately 10 years old. Asking $125 plus s/h.
a bit high for a fresh water Penn!






Re: a bit high for a fresh water Penn!
Not sure how you define "1976 issue" however I purchased the Penn 712Z new/retail in 1999. Weren't the '76 versions black spool w/o gold anodize?
I'd thought the 712Z was out of production for quite a few years. Only the 704Z & 706Z were listed, but not illustrated, in '05 Penn catalog. A funny thing about published list prices is that an old list price will always be the old list price.
What does Wright list the 704Z & 706Z at? Perhaps I'd get some bites asking $100 plus s/h for the NOS 712Z?
IMO the 712Z appears to be every bit as salt resistant as the 704Z, thus equally suited to salt water use. I fish SW exclusively here in FL & virtually no other inshore anglers I see use anything as big as the 704Z, most use gear that's less capable than the 712Z.SWIM JIG wrote: your reel is a fresh water reel 1976 issue
I'd thought the 712Z was out of production for quite a few years. Only the 704Z & 706Z were listed, but not illustrated, in '05 Penn catalog. A funny thing about published list prices is that an old list price will always be the old list price.
What does Wright list the 704Z & 706Z at? Perhaps I'd get some bites asking $100 plus s/h for the NOS 712Z?
lets clear up salt water reels and fresh water reels!





That's an interesting distinction: "to keep a warrenty valid etc from the mfg, it must say salt water use or if a fresh water reel is used in salt water the warrenty is generaly voided!"
Since the 712Z was sitting within arm's reach I took a look for you. The Penn Reels SERIES Z manual SPECIFICATIONS page indicates another interesting distinction. Every Z model is listed for either "fresh and salt" on smaller models, or "salt and fresh" on larger ones. The 712Z (& 713Z) are the last listed "salt and fresh". The warranty information printed on the bubble pack card, in the manual & the seperate warranty page make no mention of salt water use voiding a warranty.
I find no indication Penn restricted 712Z warranty exclusively as "a fresh water reel 1976 issue" & clear indications it was designed & intended for "salt and fresh" water use. Also noticed the manual is date stamped Oct 18, 1997. Of course I believe issues related to a "one year from date of purchase" mfg. warranty are mute on an 11 YO obsolete model sold by an individual, even if its NOS.
Please check your "dealers around OHIO and Michigan and PENN" for NOS 704Z & 706Z reels languishing at the old "suggested retail price" I'd like to buy some. Are your dealers obligated to warranty obsolete NOS? Those I'm familiar w/discount heavily to sell out discontinued models.
Warranty rarely interests me & I only used warranty once on reels. However, I have benefitted from the practice of replacing defective reels under warranty. My 1st Mitchell 302 came out of a discount bin at JC Penny for cheap nearly 40 years ago! It got tossed in after some small part fell off & they gave the customer a new 1 instead of repair. Picked up the part on the way home, fished w/the 302 that day & still have it.
Since the 712Z was sitting within arm's reach I took a look for you. The Penn Reels SERIES Z manual SPECIFICATIONS page indicates another interesting distinction. Every Z model is listed for either "fresh and salt" on smaller models, or "salt and fresh" on larger ones. The 712Z (& 713Z) are the last listed "salt and fresh". The warranty information printed on the bubble pack card, in the manual & the seperate warranty page make no mention of salt water use voiding a warranty.
I find no indication Penn restricted 712Z warranty exclusively as "a fresh water reel 1976 issue" & clear indications it was designed & intended for "salt and fresh" water use. Also noticed the manual is date stamped Oct 18, 1997. Of course I believe issues related to a "one year from date of purchase" mfg. warranty are mute on an 11 YO obsolete model sold by an individual, even if its NOS.
Please check your "dealers around OHIO and Michigan and PENN" for NOS 704Z & 706Z reels languishing at the old "suggested retail price" I'd like to buy some. Are your dealers obligated to warranty obsolete NOS? Those I'm familiar w/discount heavily to sell out discontinued models.
Warranty rarely interests me & I only used warranty once on reels. However, I have benefitted from the practice of replacing defective reels under warranty. My 1st Mitchell 302 came out of a discount bin at JC Penny for cheap nearly 40 years ago! It got tossed in after some small part fell off & they gave the customer a new 1 instead of repair. Picked up the part on the way home, fished w/the 302 that day & still have it.
- Lynn Thomas
- Advanced Board Poster
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 7:12 am
- Location: Ohio
Price of reels ...
Answering your question of Wrights price on the two reels. Wright's Price Guide,Third Edition, 2002 lists 704 Z at $73.99. The 706 Z lists at $94.99. (He notes that these prices are the current average retail selling price).
will try to clear up what is considered a WARRENTY )





Re: will try to clear up what is considered a WARRENTY )
Col. Milt, respectfully "the reel says" nothing. I did not offer my "idea" but merely passed along what Penn published & provided w/the 712Z reel. It was not my "idea" that the manual packed w/the 712Z reel stated it was intended for "salt and fresh" use, it was quoting Penn. I'm sorry that contradicts your claim my "reel is a fresh water reel".
Good to know dealers are expected to do something for obsolete NOS reel warrantys. Actually heard someone boast, Shimano would send a new reel to replace any POS Shimano he found at the fleamarket! Thanks for the warning: "If parts arenot availible and you send your reel in , you may get a new reel and will get a new reel in its place however they wont send your old collectable reel back to you!It most likly will be destroyed and scrapped!" Might enjoy prospecting their dumpster some days.
After reading your sermon "Lets understand a WARRENTY" I'm so glad I haven't bought a new reel in nearly a decade. As I said, its all mute anyway b/c I bought the 712Z in '99 & had no expectation, nor did I make any inquiry about anyone honoring the 1 year warranty. It is not & never was an issue for me.SWIM JIG wrote: If the reel says not salt water garrenteed , thats what it means! Not your idea of warrenty!
Good to know dealers are expected to do something for obsolete NOS reel warrantys. Actually heard someone boast, Shimano would send a new reel to replace any POS Shimano he found at the fleamarket! Thanks for the warning: "If parts arenot availible and you send your reel in , you may get a new reel and will get a new reel in its place however they wont send your old collectable reel back to you!It most likly will be destroyed and scrapped!" Might enjoy prospecting their dumpster some days.
This was how it was done!







Re: This was how it was done!
IMO this kind of institutionalized waste is sacrilegous. Considerably worse than the cost effectiveness of designed obsolesence.
In a more perfect world "clint sr." might have studied all returned reels to analyize the nature/frequency of defects in pursuit of perfecting the products. Of course its not "cost effective" to sell products that last too long either.
Unfortunately its rewarded by our regressive tax codes that encourage companys to take profits through losses. The practice is popular w/auto makers as well. This year there will be a maximum number of new vehicles destroyed as losses for tax purposes. Most will have no defects whatsoever. The obscene part is that the manufacturers may end up earning more from declaring the loss than they'd have gotten if the vehicles were sold through dealerships. The sick part is the millions of old vehicles in unsafe condition on the road while new ones are crushed. What makes me mad is all the millions of hours/dollars poor folks spend trying to keep rusty worn out junk running.SWIM JIG wrote:clint sr. told them that would be eazy to do, and he waliked out to the plant workshop with his coffee cup in had, he then picked up a rather large hammer, came back into the management meeting room, and said give me one of those reels that need wareenty work done on it! one member of the team handed hoim a reel , he laid it on the table raised up the hammer and smacked the reel into pices
As for the dump bins, well people would come after the plant and office were closed for the day and DIVE in the Dumpsters for reels! Then ZEBCO in a area knowen to a few select and trusted employees would take the busted reels and bury them!
And other Companies did the same and still do that to this day!
In a more perfect world "clint sr." might have studied all returned reels to analyize the nature/frequency of defects in pursuit of perfecting the products. Of course its not "cost effective" to sell products that last too long either.