It took a Canadian to get to the bottom of this...
http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/246027
GW....
-
Ron Mc
- Star Board Poster
- Posts: 3401
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 7:49 am
- Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
- Contact:
I'm on Rush Limbaugh's side?
I may have to switch.
Still, though, how can you possibly take 100 years' worth of data, and find a statistically significant trend in climate without a mean 10-degree swing - or a degree in climate science, where statistical analysis must be heresy and/or anathema.
Goldwaithe, TX, northwest of Austin, had a 36-inch overnight rainfall in 1934.
Note that G and W are both in the name of the town. Coincidence? Not with that climatology degree...
I may have to switch.
Still, though, how can you possibly take 100 years' worth of data, and find a statistically significant trend in climate without a mean 10-degree swing - or a degree in climate science, where statistical analysis must be heresy and/or anathema.
Goldwaithe, TX, northwest of Austin, had a 36-inch overnight rainfall in 1934.
Note that G and W are both in the name of the town. Coincidence? Not with that climatology degree...
The best way to skew climate data to fit the GW initiative is to take 3:00PM readings this week in Nashville. Hottest since 1952.
Of course the way to skew the data for GC (global cooling) would have been to take the readings in Nashville this last April-coldest ever!
And the beat goes on! Bad Bob
PS-Deke, where are you? Or in WWII jargon: Come in Rangoon!
Of course the way to skew the data for GC (global cooling) would have been to take the readings in Nashville this last April-coldest ever!
And the beat goes on! Bad Bob
PS-Deke, where are you? Or in WWII jargon: Come in Rangoon!