Hi guys!
How should I go about re-starting the Zebco SIG? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Clinton Beeler
Zebco SIG






-
- Ultra Board Poster
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 11:06 pm
- Location: On the Snake River or Lake Lowell
- Contact:
Clinton: To start a SIG you need to talk to ORCA President Andy Foster. The By-Laws put the President in charge of the SIG program. Andy's email address should be on this web site and in the Reel News, or give him a call. The Special Interest Group program has been one of ORCA's few failures. I stopped carrying any information about them in The Reel News because the organizers of the SIG's didn't fulfil their obligations. Ben Wright, with his Open Face Spinning Reel SIG, was the only person who ever created a group that was organized and he supplied information for ORCA. I'm not sure I personally feel the SIG program should be carried on. I think it might be much more valuable to the membership to have you write articles about Zebco, which would certainly help spur interest in Zebco reels. The members would then spur more articles with questions, etc, and the whole thing would probably snowball. ORCA undoubtedly has more members collecting Pflueger reels than any other brand, but there has never been a Pflueger SIG. We also have published more Pflueger information than any other brand name. So you really don't need a SIG unless you have some reason to want to organize one.
Phil
Milt: I'll take all the Lew's Speed Spools (by Shimano, not Zebco) that you can send me in the box for $30. They are already collectible and a NIB one would probably bring $100-150.
Phil
Milt: I'll take all the Lew's Speed Spools (by Shimano, not Zebco) that you can send me in the box for $30. They are already collectible and a NIB one would probably bring $100-150.






- clinton_beeler
- Advanced Board Poster
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 2:32 pm
- Location: Tulsa , Oklahoma
Phil,
I think you're right. The SIG sounds like more work than I have time for right now. What is the deadline for articles? I think I'm about ready to start.
Milt,
I had a nice conversation with father yesterday and the subject of the knurling machine came up again. Father is going to contact one of R.D. Hull's model makers anyway and he will probably know exactly what was used. When I find out I'll let you know.
I've been trying all year to ask this guy about the 333 that was listed in the auction notes in the January issue of RN. He was the one who both made and sold that reel. If there is a second one in existence it would be in the hands of the Hull family. It was taken to the ASA show in 1966 and a trademark infringement suit was threatened over the name. When I saw the picture it looked way too much like a 909. I'm fairly certain that the 333 prototype that sold on E-bay was also the prototype for the 909 (they just changed the name/label). The 909 is very significant because it was the first spin-cast reel Zebco made which was not designed by R.D. Hull. It was, in fact, designed by Don Packard who was R.D.'s draftsman of many years. Anyway, this guy will know.
If anyone has all the production Zebco reels NIB it would be Otto. Father said once that he has one of everything NIB.
At its peak Zebco was an assembly plant. A vendor tried to raise his prices
once too often and father "acquired" his factory (on an expense account). That became the "West" plant. That's where the plastic parts were made. Later they added die-casting (spools) and that's also where the line was wound onto the spools. No, I don't think they ever made their own rods.
As an assembly plant Zebco would typically make 32-36,000 reels a day. It was something to watch (which I did many times). About 28,000 of these were 202s. 33 production was about 2500 per day when we moved here and rose to about 4500 at its peak. If I remember correctly the line was Stren monofilament and 8 lb. was a popular weight.
Thank you for your help!
Regards,
Clinton
I think you're right. The SIG sounds like more work than I have time for right now. What is the deadline for articles? I think I'm about ready to start.
Milt,
I had a nice conversation with father yesterday and the subject of the knurling machine came up again. Father is going to contact one of R.D. Hull's model makers anyway and he will probably know exactly what was used. When I find out I'll let you know.
I've been trying all year to ask this guy about the 333 that was listed in the auction notes in the January issue of RN. He was the one who both made and sold that reel. If there is a second one in existence it would be in the hands of the Hull family. It was taken to the ASA show in 1966 and a trademark infringement suit was threatened over the name. When I saw the picture it looked way too much like a 909. I'm fairly certain that the 333 prototype that sold on E-bay was also the prototype for the 909 (they just changed the name/label). The 909 is very significant because it was the first spin-cast reel Zebco made which was not designed by R.D. Hull. It was, in fact, designed by Don Packard who was R.D.'s draftsman of many years. Anyway, this guy will know.
If anyone has all the production Zebco reels NIB it would be Otto. Father said once that he has one of everything NIB.
At its peak Zebco was an assembly plant. A vendor tried to raise his prices
once too often and father "acquired" his factory (on an expense account). That became the "West" plant. That's where the plastic parts were made. Later they added die-casting (spools) and that's also where the line was wound onto the spools. No, I don't think they ever made their own rods.
As an assembly plant Zebco would typically make 32-36,000 reels a day. It was something to watch (which I did many times). About 28,000 of these were 202s. 33 production was about 2500 per day when we moved here and rose to about 4500 at its peak. If I remember correctly the line was Stren monofilament and 8 lb. was a popular weight.
Thank you for your help!
Regards,
Clinton
ORCA established SIGs years ago for the purpose of educating the membership. We hoped that groups of like-minded collectors would exchange ideas on what research they needed to do in their areas of interest and then begin to do it. The Board hoped/expected that each SIG would publish at least an article per year on their research results. As Phil indicated, that hasn't happened.
The role of the SIG chairman is not necessarily to do the research and write the articles. It's more of a "coaching" job, in which he/she helps to identify research topics of interest, contacts SIG members who might be willing to get to libraries, catalog collections and such, coordinates the research, and arranges to share the accumulated knowledge with the rest of ORCA. Sounds good on paper.
The role of the SIG chairman is not necessarily to do the research and write the articles. It's more of a "coaching" job, in which he/she helps to identify research topics of interest, contacts SIG members who might be willing to get to libraries, catalog collections and such, coordinates the research, and arranges to share the accumulated knowledge with the rest of ORCA. Sounds good on paper.