Hey, Steve V & Milt L - Matt L has pics of my mystery Re
- Len Sawisch
- Site Admin
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 10:56 am
- Location: Michigan
Hey, Steve V & Milt L - Matt L has pics of my mystery Re
Check out the 1903 Pritzlaff cataloge, copy of page 11, upper right hand corner. I swear that is my mystery "Star" reel - correct foot, pillars with shoulders, same handle, same raised hard rubber face with nickel plated bands. Stuck in there with all those Pflueger trade reels.
What do you think?
http://www.antiquefishinglures.net/catalogs.htm
What do you think?
http://www.antiquefishinglures.net/catalogs.htm
- john elder
- Star Board Poster
- Posts: 8669
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 2:44 pm
I got one too
I got one too, oops make that three or four, five? Ooops again, each one has something ever so slightly different. Do you think someone at Montague (or maybe Pflueger?) knew they would be driving reel collectors crazy in the future? Or was it some deliberate action by Montague to say the reel they made for company "A" is "different" for the ones they made for company "B" because they changed a knob shape?
Why do Pflueger reels look so much like Montague reels?
Seriously, Len's reel looks like either a 1904 Montague steel pivot # 5007 to 5012, Pflueger National, Pfluegers Tarpon Reel (see catalog F-25), Pflueger's Fine Quality Rubber Metal Bound Multiplying Reel (same catalog - now that's a dead ringer).
Why do Pflueger reels look so much like Montague reels?
Seriously, Len's reel looks like either a 1904 Montague steel pivot # 5007 to 5012, Pflueger National, Pfluegers Tarpon Reel (see catalog F-25), Pflueger's Fine Quality Rubber Metal Bound Multiplying Reel (same catalog - now that's a dead ringer).
Len's reel is shown in more detail here: http://orcaonline.org/images/pixel.gif? ... /Mo/Sa.htm
I badgered him for pictures a couple of years ago, because the grasp and foot looked similar to those used on some Star Reel Works reels.
Brian is right to suspect collusion among reelmakers. It looks as if half the makers in NY and Conn. outsourced the parts-making each year to the other half, while they assembled the reels themselves. The next year, they would all switch roles. Pflueger just copied whatever was on the market.
As proof, check out the Vom Hofe Pennells on the Pritzlaff pg. 12.
I badgered him for pictures a couple of years ago, because the grasp and foot looked similar to those used on some Star Reel Works reels.
Brian is right to suspect collusion among reelmakers. It looks as if half the makers in NY and Conn. outsourced the parts-making each year to the other half, while they assembled the reels themselves. The next year, they would all switch roles. Pflueger just copied whatever was on the market.
As proof, check out the Vom Hofe Pennells on the Pritzlaff pg. 12.








- Len Sawisch
- Site Admin
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 10:56 am
- Location: Michigan
YOUR GUYS ARE A HOOT!
Combining what I have picked up already and the conversation here, I guess:
* My reel is probably a Monti, and maybe a Pflueger (like Brian's, front row, 2nd from left) but not a Star (which shoots the retail value in my book':bash:').
* The rounded foot in the artist's drawing is the only major difference from my reel, and mine is stamped "Quadruple" (a name used by Monti, Pflueger, and countless others!).':roll:'
* The same banded face plate shows up in Montis and Pluegers over many years, but the shoulders on the pillars and the fake foot pillars through the foot (it is just a one-piece foot/pillars) suggest pre-1905.':doh:'
* Milt sent me five similar reels - two are very close but neither has the fake foot pillars - the other three are definitely Montis.':bricks:'
* The stamped numbers inside reels suggest at least two theories:
1. Hand-made reels needed parts to be numbered so at the company party when someone's enebreated spouse feel into the work bench, production wasn't shut down for two or three weeks.':oops:'
2. Not all parts were interchangable on "the line" so parts that went to specific models were stamped or etched for ease of assembly.'
'
So while not a four page article, it is a four bullet posting! Thanks for the insights, Y'all!
* My reel is probably a Monti, and maybe a Pflueger (like Brian's, front row, 2nd from left) but not a Star (which shoots the retail value in my book':bash:').
* The rounded foot in the artist's drawing is the only major difference from my reel, and mine is stamped "Quadruple" (a name used by Monti, Pflueger, and countless others!).':roll:'
* The same banded face plate shows up in Montis and Pluegers over many years, but the shoulders on the pillars and the fake foot pillars through the foot (it is just a one-piece foot/pillars) suggest pre-1905.':doh:'
* Milt sent me five similar reels - two are very close but neither has the fake foot pillars - the other three are definitely Montis.':bricks:'
* The stamped numbers inside reels suggest at least two theories:
1. Hand-made reels needed parts to be numbered so at the company party when someone's enebreated spouse feel into the work bench, production wasn't shut down for two or three weeks.':oops:'
2. Not all parts were interchangable on "the line" so parts that went to specific models were stamped or etched for ease of assembly.'
So while not a four page article, it is a four bullet posting! Thanks for the insights, Y'all!








- Len Sawisch
- Site Admin
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 10:56 am
- Location: Michigan
What The ...
Col. Milt (and interested others)
Your reels are in the mail. I have solved all the mysteries I care to handle at this point - I have a backlog of Marhoffs to ponder over.
As for the email issue, anything coming from is not me as that account went defunct last December. It is not unusual for a virus program to grab an old email address and "pretend" it is sending messages from that address.
So as the old song goes "No, No, No, it ain't me, Babe!"
Your reels are in the mail. I have solved all the mysteries I care to handle at this point - I have a backlog of Marhoffs to ponder over.
As for the email issue, anything coming from is not me as that account went defunct last December. It is not unusual for a virus program to grab an old email address and "pretend" it is sending messages from that address.
So as the old song goes "No, No, No, it ain't me, Babe!"
